After our last module I thought it would be interesting and relevant to take a look at the role social media plays in politics and political trends. For this specific post I will take a look at Facebook, as there has been much conversation and controversy that last few years about Facebook involvement in politics. Facebook was created to connect millions of people worldwide as a major goal by Zuckerberg. Ultimately, Facebook has done exactly that. Facebook (and other social media platforms) have brought attention to certain global and social issues that many would not be aware of otherwise. Therefore, there are positive aspects of social media, but Facebook has the potential, and has led to political polarization and impacting political landscape, especially in the 2016 election. Through the "algorithmic solution" set up to only show individuals certain post based on what they like but also what the company wants to promote, and censorship and removal of videos and articles depending on the political affiliation attached to them, Facebook has in many ways contributed to biases and political polarization. Ultimately, free speech should be allowed on Facebook (as long as it is not discriminatory, violent, etc.) which means that its users should have freedom in what it posts. Furthermore, has a right to ban political videos and articles all together, but if that is the guidelines that Facebook chooses for its company, then it should ban all political ads and articles, instead of banning some and allowing others. This article from NPR attached below highlights the same ideas that I touched on, such as Facebook stating that it banned political ads during the last presidential and senate election, but how more than 70, 000 political ads were still shared
on Facebook.
on Facebook.
https://www.npr.org/2021/12/09/1062516250/researchers-explain-why-they-believe-facebook-mishandles-political-ads
I definitely think social media, with Facebook being one of the original pioneers, has done a lot of good and a lot of bad. As you said, they've allowed for the proliferation of news stories that may not have gained as much attention, particularly on a national level, otherwise. However, they've also contributed to the formation of echo chambers, increased polarization, and the spread of "fake news". Although platforms have tried to regulate this to an extent, it's hard to prevent everything from slipping through. As you mentioned, even though Facebook did its best to limit political ads during the election, many were still shared. This attempt at regulation isn't without criticism from free speech proponents either. I'm interested as time goes on how Facebook and other platforms will strike a balance between moderation and outright censorship. Overall, an informing read!
ReplyDeleteYou hit perfectly on how difficult it is to balance the many positives and many negatives of Facebook. Giving everyone a platform is a blessing and a curse - it allows constituents to express their views, but it also provides an effective way to spread "fake news" like never before. It'll be interesting to see how Facebook continues to tackle this issue.
ReplyDelete